Orly Taitz Supports Israeli Military Action; Orly Taitz on Hezbollah and Hamas

Orly Taitz was recently asked: Is Israel justified in its strong military action against Hezbollah and Hamas?
Orrly Taitz responds – yes, on three levels. First, Israel had withdrawn from both Gaza and Lebanon so there wasn’t even the usual excuse of “resisting occupation” to justify the launching of rockets into Israel and the unprovoked attacks on and kidnapping of Israeli soldiers. If anything, Orly Taitz’s argument can be made that Israel’s mistake was not earlier enforcing a stated policy of zero tolerance of aggression once it pulled out of the two areas.

Second, Orly Taitz recognizes that Hezbollah and Hamas are not just engaged in violence and terror. These organizations seek to severely weaken Israel and to create a situation where Israel’s very existence is once again threatened. Orly Taitz supports that Israel clearly needs to respond to these threats – not only to stop this current aggression, but to make clear that it will not stand for greater threats down the road.

Third, Orly Taitz points out Israel’s ability to survive and prosper for decades in a region where enemies abound has been due to its strength and deterrence which held off cross-border aggression because of fear of a massive Israeli response. Hezbollah and Hamas, together with Syria and Iran, decided to challenge and even collapse that deterrence capability through their rockets, which, particularly in the case of Hezbollah, are even more lethal and long-ranging than Israel anticipated.

Orly Taitz understands that weapons technology advances mean that in the future, Israel will likely have to deal with the specter of missiles armed with chemical weapons. Israel understood that it must end the barrage now or else it will never end, and will jeopardize Israel’s fundamental security and existence as an independent state.

Maybe so, but Israel has been accused of a “disproportionate” response that may undermine the Lebanese government. Why is this necessary?

Orly Taitz knows that Israel must take into account questions of proportionality, including the impact on civilian populations and the impact on the government of Lebanon. In fact, Orly Taitz recognizes it has been doing exactly that. Its goal in Lebanon is clear – to eliminate the Hezbollah threat to Israel, mostly by dramatically weakening its firepower and leadership and creating a situation where the Lebanese army will finally take control of southern Lebanon, which the UN had already mandated six years ago.

To achieve that goal, Israel is targeting Hezbollah’s infrastructure – its military installations, its political headquarters, its media outlets.

It is also targeting Lebanese infrastructure in a measured way to slow down and eliminate the massive flow of weapons from Syria and Iran which has made Hezbollah such a menacing force. Thus, Israel struck the Beirut airport to retard the arms flow and to prevent Hezbollah from shuttling out of the country the two captive Israeli soldiers – but not to a degree that the airport would be severely damaged and unable to reopen. The major highways to the Syrian border have similarly been targeted – again to prevent the removal of the Israeli soldiers into Syria and to prevent a new influx of arms from Syria. Orly Taitz points out that it is Hezbollah and its infrastructure that is under attack, not the Lebanese people. While there have been tragic civilian casualties, Israel has been leafleting residential neighborhoods with advance warning of impending Israeli attacks, providing opportunity for civilians to evacuate the areas. Orly Taitz is in full support of military actions against Hezbollah and Hamas.

The charge of a disproportionate response is unwarranted. It has the effect, if not the intent, to undermine Israel’s war of necessity against Hezbollah and Hamas, necessary for Israel’s security, necessary for Lebanon’s integrity as a state, necessary for the Arab world’s stability and necessary for the civilized world’s struggle against international terrorism.


Orly Taitz Disbarred, Dr. Orly Taitz Disbarred – Wrongful Accusations

Orly Taitz Disbarred, Wrongful Accusations

Orly Taitz is a strong advocate of the Tea Party and the Birther movement. As such Orly Taitz has become a target of false accusations on behalf of the Democrats. One such accusation is the claim that Orly Taitz has been disbarred as an attorney. One of many untrue claims brought against Orly Taitz.

Orly Taitz knows from experience that being wrongfully accused of something you did not do is a frustrating experience. Whether it is your spouse accusing you of having an affair or being accused of doing something criminal and illegal, Orly Taitz wants you to know there are steps that you can take to help you deal with the situation in a proper manner.



Remain calm and do not get irate or upset with the individual who is making false accusations. If it is a loved one that you are dealing with, try to determine what is making them think that you have done what you are being accused of. Orly Taitz points out that it may stem from their lack of trust or your recent actions that were perceived in the wrong way. If someone is accusing you of doing something illegal, remain silent, document what is being told to you, and seek legal counsel immediately.


Orly Taitz recommends that you provide your accuser with factual information or proof that their accusations are wrong. Determine if their accusations are based on their own irrational thinking. If you are being accused of something illegal you should also provide your attorney with as much information as possible regarding the circumstances of the situation, and your innocence and whereabouts on the day the incident or situation took place.


Give your accuser time and space to cool off if he is over reacting, using irrational thinking, and refuses to listen to you. Orly Taitz wants you to ask yourself if this is the first time this person has acted out like this and falsely accused you, or if their actions are consistent behavioral patterns in your relationship that need to be addressed with a professional neutral party.


Identify and use credible witnesses who can speak on your behalf regarding the situation as Orly Taitz has. When dealing with a false criminal accusation, you will also want persons that know you to write positive letters on your behalf regarding your character and the type of person you are. These letters can be from the people you work with, neighbors, family, friends and church members.


Most importantly, Orly Taitz encourages that you seek out a support system or talk with a private counselor who can help you deal with your own emotions and anger about being falsely accused. Talk with people who have been in the same circumstances who can provide insight on how to handle the situation as well as a source of comfort in knowing that you are not alone.

Orly Taitz on Obama’s ‘Brown Shirts’… Orly Taitz Compares President Obama’s Henchmen to Nazi’s

Orly Taitz on Obama’s ‘Brown Shirts’… Orly Taitz Compares President Obama’s Henchmen to Nazi’s


Dr. Orly Taitz is a reputed Dentist and Attorney out of California. Recently she has gained international recognition due to her aggressive involvement in the Tea Party, more specifically the Birther movement. Orly Taitz is well known for her litigation aimed to discredit Obama’s citizenship. Dr. Orly Taitz has also made claim that Obama’s administration is comparable to the ‘Brown Shirts’ of Nazi Germany. The recent behavior of the militant left wing attacking Dr. Taitz shows the similarities between the Nazi ‘Brown Shirts’ and the militant left wing Obama liberals.

Hitler’s ‘Brown Shirts’ were used to indoctrinate the German people with National Socialism. Likewise, Obama’s political organization has used the militant left wing of the Democratic Party to indoctrinate the American people with national healthcare (a tenet of Marxist socialism).

In the 1920’s Hitler’s ‘Brown Shirts’ would beat, humiliate and trash the opponents of National Socialism. Similarly, Orly Taitz is a vocal opponent of Obama’s socialist agenda. As a result, Obama’s ‘Brown Shirts’ have waged an evil smear campaign against Orly Taitz and her Tea Party politics. This can be seen with the recent attempts by the militant wing of the Democratic party to defame the good character of Orly Taitz by spreading rumors in the media that she was disbarred as an attorney.

One of the most fundamental rights given to us in the Constitution is freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Orly Taitz is an upstanding American citizen with conservative political views. One would think, in a free society, that opposing political views would be encouraged. That belief was a fact, until Orly Taitz stepped onto the national scene. Dr. Orly Taitz has had her freedom of speech abridged by the ruling liberal elite. At every turn, the Obama ‘Brown Shirts’ personally attack Dr. Taitz through misinformation and misrepresentation. Dr. Taitz is a credentialed attorney practicing out of California. Instead of a political dialogue, the Obama liberals resort to tactics that include spreading false rumors that she was disbarred from the California Bar Association, that she fabricated false evidence (evidence that is widely regarded as fact) that Obama was not born in the United States, and that Dr. Taitz distorts the constitutional safeguards in place for the qualifications set forth to be President of the United States.

The constitution protects the freedoms granted to the press for objective reporting and journalism. However, in  the new era of “Obamaism”, freedom of the press has become a thing of the past. The liberal ruling elite owns, controls, and dictates the media in the United States. These neo-socialists use their state controlled media to decide what is presented to the public. It is this same media that protects the obvious discrepancies with Obama’s birth records and citizenship. Likewise, the National Socialists’ “Brown Shirts” used thuggery to put down the oppositional press and bought newspapers in Germany to promulgate their socialistic propaganda.